BACK Critical Reading
Documentary genres: Docu-fiction: Refers to documentary that has a cinematographic combination of documentary and fiction. In other words, it is a documentary that contains a large amount of fictional aspects. This genre is often confused with docu-drama; the difference is that docu-fiction is filmed in reality of “real-time”. Docu-drama: Documentary that features a dramatised re-enactment of historical events. This genre is often shot at a different time than the events portrayed. These documentaries are at times filmed at a location to create a real set. A lot of elements of docu-drama are similar to the production of a fictional film, however everything portrayed in a docu-drama is based on historical facts. Ethnofiction: this genre blends together documentary and visual anthropology to portray natives playing themselves as character to inform about a particular ethnic or social group. Mockumentary: This genre mocks a documentary. It presents fictitious events in a documentary format. Often these productions analyse or comment on social or current events taking place. Mockumentaries are considered quite difficult to get right as they often fall under the comedy or satirical genre. Mondo film: This genre is often considered an exploitation documentary film. It at times resembles pseudo-documentary. Characteristics of this genre include taboo subjects such as death or sex, portrayals of foreign cultures. Films done in this genre have sometimes been accused of racism. Honest truthes: Documentary filmaker on Ethical challenges in the work. This article looks into the struggle documentary film makers have when showing truthfulness in documentary and keeping an ethical standard. Concerns for ethics in documentary are not a new thing; however they have intensified over the past years due to alterations in the industry. In the 1990s in the U.S., documentary film was becoming widely popular as entertainment. Film makers were regarded quite highly; therefore there was more pressure from the economy and society was scrutinising them for their ethical standards. This article is very useful as it gives a perceptive look into documentaries such as Fahrenheit 9/11, Mighty times: the children’s march, and Ghosts of Abu Ghraib and Standard Operating Procedure. All of these documentaries are examples of how the audience questions the accuracy of them and judges whether the stories were fabricated or not. The article go on the explain how for film makers its more difficult as they are mostly freelancers selling their work to bigger companies such as PBS, Discovery, and National geographic. Some of the ethical limitations that film makers go to are seen as quite controversial. For example, the article has a quote from a film maker stating that they broke an animal’s leg during a wildlife shoot just so they could get the shot of the animal. Other issues that are expanded on in the article are about when film makers set up scenes. This gives viewers the impression that it is truthful when it had been staged to look truthful. A lot of television and film companies discourage this as it gives a false impression. The article goes on the explain how each film maker has to make their own decision as to how ethically far they want to go such has whether protect the subjects vulnerability and integrity or to just do what they felt the documentary requires.
|